Project #3 Visual Binary Stars

Visual binary stars are two stars in orbit around each other. They are far enough from each other to be seen as two separate stars, but are close enough to be under each other's gravitational influence. In this exercise we will do four things:

  1. Measure of the angular distance between the two stars in a visual binary star system
  2. Measure the difference in brightness of the two stars
  3. Measure the difference in color of the two stars
  4. Estimate the resolving power of the telescope

 

Observations

   Two lists of visual binary stars.

 

'Wide' pairs

Name

RA (2000)

DEC (2000)

Mag 1

Mag 2

 

h m s 

' '' 

 

 

p And

00 36 53

+33 43 10

4.5

8.5

l Ari

01 57 56

+23 35 46

4.8

7.6

g And*

02 03 53

+42 19 47

2.3

4.8

h Per*

02 50 42

+55 53 44

3.8

8.5

1 Cam

04 32 00

+53 55 00

5.7

6.8

14 Aur

05 15 24

+32 41 15

5.4

7.9

19 Lyn

07 22 54

+55 17 00

5.6

6.5

i Cnc*

08 46 41

+28 45 45

4.0

6.6

t  Leo

11 27 56

+02 51 23

5.2

7.4

a CVn

12 56 01

+38 19 00

2.9

5.6

z UMa

13 23 56

+54 55 25

2.3

4.0

b Cyg*

19 30 44

+27 57 45

3.1

5.1

d Cep

22 29 10

+58 24 55

4.0

6.0

94 Aqr

23 19 07

-13 27 31

5.3

7.3

 


 

'Resolution' pairs Fall

Name
RA (2000)
Dec(2000)
Mag
2 Equ
21 02 13
+07 10.8
7.1,7.1
HD 224635/6
23 59 29
+33 43.4
6.5,6.7
HD 200375
21 03 03
+01 31.9
6.7,7.3
l Cyg
20 47 25
+36 29.4
4.9,6.1
16 Vul
20 02 01
+24 56.3
5.7,6.0
72 Peg
23 33 57
+31 19.5
6.0,6.0
HD 215242
22 43 04
+47 10.1
6.2,7.0
 

 

'Resolution' pairs Spring

Name
RA (2000)
Dec (2000)
Mag
g Ari
1 53 32
+19 17.6
4.8,4.8
HD 48766/7
6 48 12
+55 42.3
6.3,6.3
HD 28867
4 33 33
+18 01.0
7.0,7.1
HD 44496
6 22 50
+17 34.4
7.3,8.3
12 Lyn
6 46 14
+59 26.5
5.4,6.0
57 Cnc
8 54 15
+30 34.7
6.0,6.5
HD 55130
7 12 49
+27 13.5
7.2,7.2
HD 61563
7 40 07
+05 13.9
6.6,6.9
7 Tau
3 34 27
+24 27.9
6.6,6.7

 

 

Listed in each table is the name of the star, its position in the sky and the brightness of each component in magnitudes. The wide pairs will be used for 1 through 3 above. The resolution pairs will be used to estimate the resolution of the telescope, # 4 above.

First, spend some time focusing the telescope as well as you can.

From the wide pairs you need to observe at least two systems.  The first should have a *.  Choose the second from those without a *. Whichever you choose, make sure you see both stars. For each observation be careful that the brightest star is not over-exposed. Since these are very bright stars, your exposure times will be short. However make sure that you can see the faintest member of the system clearly. Observe each system in B V R and I. As you take CCD pictures of the systems also write-down carefully what they look like in the eyepiece (Include an estimate of the relative brightness and the colors.)

The strategy for the resolution pairs is a bit different. These two stars are much closer together than the wide pairs. What we are trying to do is to find out how close together stars can get in the sky before they merge together into one image. The resolution pairs are arranged in order from the widest to the closest.  Look at each system visually in the eyepiece, writing down what you see. Or you can just 'go for it' and try the closest one. If you see two stars in the closest one that's as good as you will get. If not you can try one further up the list. Also take a picture in either R or I. Even if you can't see two stars with your naked eye, you might make out the difference in the CCD image later.

Reduction and analysis

Before you start reduction make sure you have reviewed ‘HOW TO REDUCE DATA’. Start with the wide pairs. On each image measure:

  1. The x and y coordinates of each component
  2. The brightness (magnitude) of each star

You might want to arrange a table for this so you can do it systematically. You can use the logging ability of  the reduction software to help you record the data. If you like spreadsheets this is a good time to use one.


The separation of each wide pair

Find the distance between the components in pixels and convert it to arcseconds using the arcsec/pixel value you found in Project #2.

The brightness difference

Let's do this in magnitudes as astronomers do. Record the difference in magnitudes in each color. The differences you have measured in V should be close to the differences of the two magnitudes in the table above. You reduction software does not have enough information to convert what it measures into real (standard) magnitudes for the stars. To get the actual magnitudes of each star in the table we would have to calibrate the telescope.

Look at the differences in the other colors. How do they compare? Is there a trend from B to I, that is, do the differences get larger or smaller going from B to I?

Color

The difference in the magnitudes from color to color reflects the differences in the colors of the stars. Again, to get the actual color of the star (called the color index) we would have to calibrate the telescope. However, the color difference of the magnitude difference is a good approximation of difference in the star's color. Calculate both the R-I differences and the B-V differences. Can you say more about why the stars have different colors? How about guesses on spectral types? Which stars are the brighter, the 'red' ones or the 'blue' ones? Explain.

The resolution of the telescope

The resolution or resolving power of a telescope is given by  

Resolution = 2.5 105 l /diameter

where l is the wavelength of the light (color) you observe and the diameter is the diameter of the telescope mirror. For the UGA telescope the latter is 0.6m. For R you may use 7 x 10-7 m and for I, 9 x 10-7 m. What is the theoretical resolution of the UGA telescope?

Now let us see how close we get to that. Look at each of the close pairs. See if you can distinguish two stars or is it just one blob? You might measure the length and width of the star image with the cursor. Be careful, as any EW elongation of exposures of more than a second or so may be due to the telescope drifting. Which images can you see two stars? Put them in a rough order as to how far apart the stars seem -or how elongated the image is. Compare this to the order in the table. When you have done that come to me and find out what your best resolution is and include it in your write up.

Write-Up

As usual describe your observations and your approach to the problem. For the wide pairs you will want to include what you wrote about your visual observations as well as your measurements. One way to do this is 'star at a time'. Describe all your observations and results on one object before moving to the next

For the close pairs you will need to describe carefully what led you to decide there were two images not one. Remember, the more negative or smaller the magnitude, the fainter the star.